Raising Interest Rates Opinion
Is it
possible that consumption behaves perversely with respect to interest rates
beyond a certain point?
If the
Fed lowers interest rates, people say, “wow, it is better to consume now than
to save,” and then people consume. But what if those people want to save for
retirement and the Fed pushes down interest rates really low. Then those people
say, “Wow, I really can’t meet my savings goal (the compound interest is too
low). I am going to be on the streets when I am old, so I better put more money
in my savings account now.” That is the perverse effect of low interest rates.
You
could get savings increase rather than decrease. And as far as investment goes,
it is not clear that the key constraint on investment is interest rates. It may
be aggregate demand. People tend to invest when they think demand for goods are
high. But if there is this perverse effect of interest rates on consumption
than you are not helping aggregate demand. The constraints on investment may be
other than the cost of capital. So, in other words, you are pushing down
interest rates but you are not having the effect you desire of increasing
aggregate demand.
So
should the Fed continue raising interest rates? For sure because we haven’t
seen all the moves so far pay off. And at some point, like the generals in
World War I, sending people over the trench and seeing them mowed down, you
start asking whether this tactic actually works. And you can’t keep saying
more, more, and more. So we’re about at that place where we need to ask is more
the answer? That doesn’t mean less is the immediate answer. The problem with
monetary policy is that changes matter. From where you are, you change very
abruptly, you cause a lot of disruption. You have to have a measured pace of
change. But it is probably not towards more accommodation.
China to Induce Corporate Defaults
China
posted its worst weekly decline in 3 weeks due to improving economic data that
will prevent further stimulus, which will trigger corporate defaults. At least 7 firms missed note payments this
year already topping 2015. The government might holdback on bailing companies
out of defaults in order to unsaturated the market and lessen supply.
Google and Microsoft to Settle Disputes
Microsoft
and Google reached an agreement to stop running to regulators with complaints
about each other and settle their squabble internally. Google says “Our
companies compete vigorously, but we want to do so on the merits of our
products, not in legal proceedings.” This might be due to the heat Google has
been taking with the EU antitrust laws concerning pre downloading Google apps
on the android. FairSearch and ICOMP are two antitrust groups that fight
Google. Microsoft left membership to those groups. Google is facing charges for
its search engine shopping ads in an antitrust manner.
Regulations in China Hurts Apple
China
just shut down Itunes movie store and ibooks in their market. Further moves to
curtail apple products can hurt apple sales especially because China is apple’s
second largest market. Apple values customer security and the Chinese
government said “They are interested in protecting the content that the Chinese
people see, policing its national security and favoring indigenous giants such
as Huawei, Alibaba and Tencent," For years, there has been a limit to the
success of American technology companies in China. Capture too much market
share or wield too much influence, and Beijing will push back.
Apple
has largely been an exception to that trend. Yet the Silicon Valley company is
now facing a regulatory push against its services in China that could signal
its good relations in the country may be turning. in addition, the Chinese
government proposed an antiterrorism law two years ago that would require
foreign companies to turn over encryption keys — the codes that enable
otherwise-scrambled information to be viewed — for security reasons. Though the
language was ultimately dropped, analysts said the government wants to have
access to all communications within China. There have been some signs of
trouble ahead. Mr. Xi has presided over a deep freeze on the Internet,
increasing censorship and taking aim at online tools used to circumvent China's
system of online filters, known as the Great Firewall. He has also added new
policy tools to keep tabs on electronic communications. Mr. Xi heads a
committee of top leaders set up to streamline tech and Internet policy and turn
the country into a "cyberpower." Carl Icahn said that China's
government could "come in and make it very difficult for Apple to sell
there ... they can do pretty much what you want there."
Uber to Keep Drivers as Independent
Contractors
Uber
reached an 100 million dollar settlement that would classify its drivers as
independent contractors because employees cost a lot more to compensate. This
would require Uber to allow its drivers to ask for tips. This eliminates the
cash free Uber experience that is a value proposition of the business. But losing
these cases at trial could have forced the company to reclassify drivers as
employees, leading to potentially billions of dollars in additional costs, such
as health benefits and auto expenses, and jeopardizing its long-term prospects
for profitability.
Puerto Rican Debt Crisis
Puerto
Rico is expected to miss a $422 million payment to bondholders due Monday, with
Gov. Alejandro Padilla predicting default. Analysts say chances are low that
Puerto Rico will pay $2 billion in additional debt by a July 1 deadline. The
defaults will complicate the island’s efforts to restructure its total debt,
which amounts to $72 billion. They could also force the territorial government
to curtail public services, like health care and electricity, while slashing
government jobs and pensions for retirees.
Raising Interest Rates Opinion
Among
the various factors that play an important role in the policymaker's decision
to increase interest rates, the dollar and its impact on exports is a key
consideration. As interest rates rise, the dollar strengthens against key
trading partner currencies. This has a negative impact on net exports and
weakens GDP growth. Exports support nearly 12 million jobs in the United States
and exporters pay 18% higher wages (on an average) than non-exporters. The US
is a consumption based economy, and there needs to be a higher focus on
production and exports. The Trans-Pacific Partnership is important from the
perspective of boosting exports, but it does require support from a relatively
weaker dollar in order for U.S products to be competitive oversees.
No comments:
Post a Comment